Who need to have a responsible

In Indonesia many kids drive when they are under age. An accident, occurred when a boy named Dul who is only 13 years old drove a car, on the road, and killed 7 people. Many people believe that Dhani should be held responsible for Duls action. I believe Dhani is responsible because he gave him a car and knew he drove it.

It has been argued that Dul is responsible because he was behind the wheel of the car. However the car was bought by his father. Therefore, by buying a car, it gave Dul the wrong massage, and made think he could drive it.

Many people say, Dul knew he was doing something wrong, because he turned off his phone. Although he turned off his phone this act it means that he knew it was wrong things that to do, that the under ages are cannot drive a car and it was dangerous.

Actually we can thought that his father have a responsibility but, I choose that he have responsibility because if his father don’t call that after he go to drive a car to the road, but Dhani turn off the phone so he cannot listen the phone, so it was be a Dhani’s responsibility.

For this reason, I think the Dhani is have a responsibility. 

The accident

To the chief of police,

An accident occurred at the Volupides’ residence, we arrived on the scene at 2:00 A.M. on 20th  September 1920. We found Arthur’s body lying on the end of the stairs, on his back, face-up his legs are on the stairs. Queenie stood beside Arthur’s dead body. Queenie mentioned that Arthur slipped on the stairs and fell when he wanted to take another drink, she also mentioned that the paramedics said that the wound on Arthur’s head is his cause of death.

After conducting a further investigation, it seems like what Queenie said did not support the evidence. The first evidence that what Queenie said isn’t true is that when someone trips on the stairs, they will usually try to reach out and grab the nearest thing that they can hold to. But when we focus on the wall, the displays aren’t even misplaced. In fact, they’re still neatly hanged.

Second, when someone who is holding something fragile trips or falls from the stairs, they will try to let go of the object to grab hold onto something. But the glass was still tightly held in Arthur’s hand, and it’s still whole. While when someone is holding something fragile trips or falls, the fragile object usually break.

When someone trips or falls on a carpet-covered stairs, the carpet are usually messed up, but the carpet on the stairs were not messed up and it’s still neat. There are no paramedics present, according to what Queenie had said, she had contacted the paramedics and the paramedics had came over and states Arthur’s cause of death. But there are no paramedics present. Arthur is lying on his back, face up with his legs on the stairs.

When someone falls down from the stairs, their face and body will be facing the ground. Queenie had also informed that while she was going out to the party, Arthur stayed home. Yet, Arthur is wearing a formal attire underneath his robe. Usually, when someone stayed home they wouldn’t be wearing formal attires. And when we arrive, the stove is still on while it is around 1 A.M. Usually, people cook meals at a reasonable time.

Based on our investigations and evidences, we can conclude that Arthur didn’t die because he fell from the stairs. We speculate that Arthur was indeed drunk, and Queenie did went ten minutes before her friends did. But she didn’t found him dead. Earlier, they had an argument, and Arthur was drunk that hour, so he can’t control his actions and words. He upsets Queenie, which caused Queenie to hit him repeatedly with a frying pan, which caused the terrible wound on Arthur’s head. She dragged Arthur’s dead body so it seems like he According to the evidences we got, we can conclude that Queenie should be tried so that we can know whether Queenie lied or not.