In Indonesia many
kids drive when they are under age. An accident, occurred when a boy named Dul who
is only 13 years old drove a car, on the road, and killed 7 people. Many people
believe that Dhani should be held responsible for Duls action. I believe Dhani
is responsible because he gave him a car and knew he drove it.
It has been argued
that Dul is responsible because he was behind the wheel of the car. However the
car was bought by his father. Therefore, by buying a car, it gave Dul the wrong
massage, and made think he could drive it.
Many people say,
Dul knew he was doing something wrong, because he turned off his phone. Although
he turned off his phone this act it means that he knew it was wrong things that
to do, that the under ages are cannot drive a car and it was dangerous.
Actually we can thought
that his father have a responsibility but, I choose that he have responsibility
because if his father don’t call that after he go to drive a car to the road,
but Dhani turn off the phone so he cannot listen the phone, so it was be a
Dhani’s responsibility.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기